<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href="https://chierchia.fr/wp-content/plugins/pretty-rss-feeds/xslt/pretty-feed.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen" ?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>grid - Ange Chierchia</title>
	<atom:link href="https://chierchia.fr/tag/grid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://chierchia.fr/tag/grid/</link>
	<description>Développeur Web full-stack</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:12:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>fr-FR</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
					<title>Should masonry be part of CSS grid? – Ahmad Shadeed</title>
					<link>https://chierchia.fr/2024/11/3500/</link>
					<comments>https://chierchia.fr/2024/11/3500/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[<span class='p-author h-card'>Ange Chierchia</span>]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2024 07:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Bookmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[masonry]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://chierchia.fr/?p=3500</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If we go with the new syntax (display: masonry), it will need a few years to become supported in all major browsers. Let’s be honest, a layout is a major part of a web page that makes it hard to apply progressive enhancement. You either have a masonry or not, right? Making it part of [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='e-content'>
<div class="wp-block-indieblocks-bookmark"><div class="u-bookmark-of h-cite"><p><i>Bookmarked <a class="u-url p-name" href="https://ishadeed.com/article/css-grid-masonry/">Should masonry be part of CSS grid?</a> by <span class="p-author">Ahmad Shadeed</span>.</i></p></div><div class="e-content">
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>If we go with the new syntax (<code>display: masonry</code>), it will need a few years to become supported in all major browsers. Let’s be honest, a layout is a major part of a web page that makes it hard to apply progressive enhancement. You either have a masonry or not, right?</p>



<p>Making it part of CSS grid will at least guarantee that the layout will work, but without the masonry stuff.</p>
</blockquote>
</div></div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://chierchia.fr/2024/11/3500/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
